![]() page for tablet and smartphone | ||
![]() ![]() click on logo to see the site on laptop or desktop. | ||
![]() |
Full participation democracy entitles all citizens to give word to their interests in the affairs of the state, either by their own voice or on their behalf. |
DEMOCRACY IN ACTION |
This picture of democracy-at-work shows elegantly that a parliament with only elderly gentlemen is incomplete, hence the empty seats and the sad look on the face of the figure on the right. Maybe the Romans already noticed and felt the lack of women in their midst and that of young persons of both gender (the picture is actually "Cicero Accuses Catiline," painted by Cesare Maccari in 1888). Whatever way we look at the picture, the parliament is an excellent forum for advocating an opinion and is best done by a representative with whom one can identify. There are of course also other ways of expressing a political idea but in the parliament we are all present or so we should. In the parliament we speak and exchange with other members to convince them of an opinion. Therefore on this place the arguments in favour of voting rights for all citizens. |
A Complete Suffrage means voting rights for all citizens Suffrage (the right to vote) for everybody poses the question who everybody is. Voting rights serve a purpose and that is to have your interests represented. Everybody has interests. Everybody means from birth on. Our interests as a citizen are already influenced by the care our pregnant mothers is given. How health care for babies, how education for children is organised and many other policies are implemented by our government, is of interest to us all. Still the persons who are concerned most by this have no say in how it is organised, how the policies are made by our government. We now think that all citizens, all persons should be represented in the parliament which can be influenced by our vote. Parliament makes the laws of the land and controls the government. Parliament as representation of the population is sovereign, is accountable only to the electorate, all of us. Having a say in these affairs by way of a vote for our representative, is a form of participation democracy. But it is only partial participation where in most countries citizens under the age of 18 years (16 in Scotland) have no vote. Our democratic government has roots in the Greek and Roman Antiquity where only a very few people (wealthy men) had a vote. From then on the argument 'we know what is best for the rest' lost more and more credibility and it is the general belief that all citizens should have an opportunity to have their voice heard through elected representatives. About 20% of our population does not have a vote. These 20% are the people under the minimum voting age. They also have interests and in some respects these are different from the interests of all others. They at least have the greatest stake in the future where most government policies have their effect. Full participation democracy should include giving a voice to ALL citizens, so from birth on. This website discusses the argument in favour of Votes For All and also for Scotland to be the first country in the world to have Complete Suffrage. |
Some arguments in favour of complete suffrage, that is from birth on. Click here for further explanation of the arguments. |
| ![]() |
Some thoughts about counter arguments What I would like to say against that view is that children do have knowledge of politics, but not all of them in the same way. Unfortunately there are many adults who lack any knowledge about politics and they also have a vote. It is not that the children themselves should go to the ballot box (what about babies crawling in and out?) but that they have an interest in the political affairs. Until they can act themselves, parents will vote on their behalf. Parents always act on the behalf of their children and are the best people to do so with the children's interest in mind. Well, not really. Of course the rules must be clear and unambiguous. One option could be to give the vote for all children born on the day of announcing the election and older up to 16 years, to the mother who then can decide whether she will do the voting or that she leaves this to her child when he/she is at that day 12 years or older. There are other options imaginable with essentially the same outcome. That may be true, but do you really think all adults can? The point is not how they vote, but that they have a vote. Would it not be up to the political candidates and political parties to present reasonable options to vote for. In that case a vote can never be wrong? |
Why Scotland could be the First country in the world with Complete Suffrage.
Scotland is a young country with a long history. The new Scottish Parliament was a mere reinstatement of the parliament dissolved in 1707. |
DEMOCRACY IN ACTION |
to approve a Complete Suffrage. What can we do? |